الراجحي المالية

Low fees and low risk, but weak returns — capital preservation only.

Low fees, but weak returns despite moderate risk.

Low fees, but weak returns despite moderate risk.

Low fees, but weak returns despite moderate risk.

Low fees, but weak returns despite moderate risk.

Low fees, but weak returns despite moderate risk.

Low fees can't offset weak returns paired with high risk.

A solid conservative choice: low fees, decent returns, contained risk.

Low fees and decent returns, balanced with moderate risk.

Low fees and decent returns, balanced with moderate risk.

Low fees and decent returns, balanced with moderate risk.

Low fees, but only average returns despite high risk — is the volatility worth it?

Low fees, but only average returns despite high risk — is the volatility worth it?

Low fees, but only average returns despite high risk — is the volatility worth it?

Excellent: low fees, strong returns, and contained risk.

Strong returns and low fees, but high volatility — for investors comfortable with swings.

Average returns don't justify the high volatility at average fees.

Strong returns at average fees, with the moderate risk you'd expect.

Strong returns but high risk and average fees — for active investors.

Worst combination: high fees, weak returns, high volatility.

Worst combination: high fees, weak returns, high volatility.

High fees, decent returns, low risk — is the manager earning the premium?

High fees, average returns, high risk — unattractive.

High fees, average returns, high risk — unattractive.

Strong returns may justify the high fees, with moderate risk.